Paul Pillar reviews the editorials in the September 13, 2010 issue of the New York Times. The editorial reflects not only the state of the war but also the the state of public discourse about the war.

Posted in ASG in the News | Tagged corruption, strategy | Comments Off

In Defense of the Afghanistan Study Group Report

Posted on September 13, 2010 by admin

Justin Logan defends A New Way Forward.

Posted in ASG in the News | Tagged criticism | Comments Off

High-level doubts on Afghanistan

Posted on September 12, 2010 by admin

Former officials who once supported the war are now questioning if it’s worth the cost.

Posted in ASG in the News | Tagged debate, strategy | Comments Off

Why Peaceniks Should Care About the Afghanistan Study Group Report

Posted on September 11, 2010 by admin

Robert Weissman encourages everyone even peace activists to read the Afghanistan Study Group Report.

Posted in ASG in the News | Tagged debate, negotiation, peace | Comments Off

‘Plan B’ For Afghanistan Aims To Spark Long Overdue Debate

Posted on September 9, 2010 by admin

Dan Froomkin speaks with Matthew Hoh regarding the goals of the Afghanistan Study Group Report.

Posted in ASG in the News | Tagged debate | Comments Off

How to leave Afghanistan

Posted on September 9, 2010 by admin

Lexington from The Economist reviews the debate over the Afghanistan war. How to prosecute? How and when to leave? And what the Afghanistan Study Group report has to say on it.

Posted in ASG in the News | Tagged debate, strategy | Comments Off

Worsening Outlook in Afghanistan

Posted on September 9, 2010 by admin

Gilles Dorronsoro details in a Q&A the deteriorating security situation on the ground in Afghanistan, analyzes U.S. strategy, and makes the case for negotiations with the insurgency.

Posted in ASG in the News | Tagged negotiation, security, strategy | Comments Off ← Older posts Newer posts →

Author Archives: admin

Affiliations: